There is much research supporting the concepts and theories underpinning the LP, some of the key papers are presented here:

Theoretical basis of the Lightning Process

For more information on the established scientific theories that underpin the Lightning Process, please click on the links :

• Neuroplasticity – the ability of the pathways of the brain to change and develop in response to learning and repetition. ((“Neuroplasticity”, National Library of Medicine, 1 May 2023 https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK557811/#:~:text=It%20is%20defined%20as%20the,traumatic%20brain%20injury%20))
  ((Adult Neuroplasticity: More Than 40 Years of Research https://www.hindawi.com/journals/np/2014/541870/abs/))
• The physiological effects of Adrenaline, Nor-Adrenaline & Cortisol in the “stress” response and allostatic load. ((Mayo clinic staff, “Stress: Win control over the stress in your life”, Mayo Foundation for Medical Education and Research, 12 September 2008 https://www.mayoclinic.com/health/stress/SR00001))
  (( Allostasis: A new paradigm to explain arousal pathology.https://psycnet.apa.org/record/1988-98352-000))
• The interaction of the body, brain and mind.
  ((Davidson RJ, et al., “Alterations in brain and immune function produced by mindfulness meditation.”, Psychosom Med. 2003 Jul-Aug;65(4):564-70.))
  ((Wilde, B., Kaptchuk, T. J., Witzke, O., & Schedlowski, M. (2018). Learned immunosuppressive placebo responses in renal transplant patients. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 115(16), 4223–4227. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1720548115))
  ((Lerner, Baron H. “Can stress cause disease? Revisiting the Tuberculosis research of Thomas Holmes, 1949-1961”, Annals of Internal Medicine, n.d.))
  ((Hennenlotter, Andreas, et al. “The Link between Facial Feedback and Neural Activity within Central Circuitries of Emotion- New Insights from Botulinum Toxin- Induced Denervation of Frown Muscles”, Cerebral Cortex Journal, June 17 2008))
• The osteopathic theory of facilitation and the impact of changes in structure causing changes in function, ((“A.T. Still’s Osteopathic Lesion Theory and Evidence-Based Models Supporting the Emerged Concept of Somatic Dysfunction”, De Gruyter, 1 October 2016 https://www.degruyter.com/document/doi/10.7556/jaoa.2016.129/html)) ((“Osteopathy”, Osteohome, n.d. https://www.osteohome.com/index.html))
• Positive psychology and the impact of neurobiology on health. ((Park, N., Peterson, C., Szvarca, D., Molen, R., Kim, E., & Collon, K. (2014). “Positive Psychology and Physical Health”, National Library of Medicine https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6124958/))
• Language and its link to neurology and health. ((Darlow, B., Fullen, B. M., Dean, S., Hurley, D. A., Baxter, G. D., & Dowell, A. (2012). The association between health care professional attitudes and beliefs and the attitudes and beliefs, clinical management, and outcomes of patients with low back pain: a systematic review. European Journal of Pain, 16(1), 3–17. https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1016/j.ejpain.2011.06.006/full))
  ((Darlow, B., Dowell, A., Baxter, G. D., Mathieson, F., Perry, M., & Dean, S. (2013). The enduring impact of what clinicians say to people with low back pain. The Annals of Family Medicine, 11(6), 527–534. http://www.annfammed.org/content/11/6/527.full))
  ((Nickel, B., Barratt, A., Copp, T., Moynihan, R., & McCaffery, K. (2017). Words do matter: a systematic review on how different terminology for the same condition influences management preferences. BMJ Open, 7(7), e014129. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2016-014129 ))
  ((Richter, M., Eck, J., Straube, T., Miltner, W. H. R., & Weiss, T. (2010). Do words hurt? Brain activation during the processing of pain-related words. PAIN, 148(2), 198–205. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pain.2009.08.009 ))
  ((Richter, M., Schroeter, C., Puensch, T., Straube, T., Hecht, H., Ritter, A., … Weiss, T. (2014). Pain-Related and Negative Semantic Priming Enhances Perceived Pain Intensity. Pain Research and Management, 19(2), 69–74. https://doi.org/10.1155/2014/425321 ))
  ((Chooi, C. S. L., White, A. M., Tan, S. G. M., Dowling, K., & Cyna, A. M. (2013). Pain vs comfort scores after Caesarean section: a randomized trial. BJA: British Journal of Anaesthesia, 110(5), 780–787. https://doi.org/10.1093/bja/aes517))
  ((Hansen, E., & Zech, N. (2019). Nocebo Effects and Negative Suggestions in Daily Clinical Practice – Forms, Impact and Approaches to Avoid Them. Frontiers in Pharmacology, 10. https://doi.org/10.3389/fphar.2019.00077 ))
• Mindfulness and how it changes physiology. ((Ferrarelli, F., Smith, R., Dentico, D., Riedner, B. A., Zennig, C., Benca, R. M., … Tononi, G. (2013). Experienced Mindfulness Meditators Exhibit Higher Parietal-Occipital EEG Gamma Activity during NREM Sleep. PLoS ONE, 8(8), e73417. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0073417))
  ((Hölzel, B. K., Carmody, J., Vangel, M., Congleton, C., Yerramsetti, S. M., Gard, T., & Lazar, S. W. (2011). Mindfulness practice leads to increases in regional brain gray matter density. Psychiatry Research: Neuroimaging, 191(1), 36–43. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pscychresns.2010.08.006))
  ((Langer, E. J. (2009). Counterclockwise: Mindful Health and the Power of Possibility (1 edition). New York: Ballantine Books. https://www.amazon.com/Counterclockwise-Mindful-Health-Power-Possibility/dp/0345502043/))
• Triggering improved physiology by accessing memories. ((Speer, M. E., Bhanji, J. P., & Delgado, M. R. (2014). Savoring the Past: Positive Memories Evoke Value Representations in the Striatum. Neuron, 84(4), 847–856.
  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuron.2014.09.028))
  ((Speer, M. E., & Delgado, M. R. (2017). Reminiscing about positive memories buffers acute stress responses. Nature Human Behaviour, 1(5), s41562-17-93–17.   https://doi.org/10.1038/s41562-017-0093))

Physiological basis of CFS/ME

Dr. Phil Parker has co-authored a paper on Understanding the Lightning Process Approach to CFS/ME; a Review of the Disease Process and the Approach ((Parker. P, Aston. J, Finch. F, Understanding the Lightning Process Approach to CFS/ME; a Review of the Disease Process and the Approachhttps://jep.ro/images/pdf/cuprins_reviste/82_art_2__v.pdf)) which identifies the main theoretical concepts of the Lightning Process’s and contextualises them within the current evidence base.

Prof. Bruun Wyller and Prof. Silje Reme, leading researchers in CFS/ME and brain-mind-body approaches, have published some interesting papers which concur with the clinical findings of the Phil Parker Lightning Process. ((Bruun Wyller, Silje Reme et al, “Chronic fatigue syndromes: real illnesses that people can recover from”, National Library of Medicine, 29 November 2023 https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/37740918/)) ((Bruun Wyller, Vegard MD et al, Multiple Articles, Various dates https://www.med.uio.no/klinmed/personer/vit/vegardw/)) ((Bruun Wyller, Vegard MD et al, “Can Sustained Arousal explain the Chronic Fatigue Syndrome”,Behavioral and Brain Functions, 23 February 2009))

Dr. Bruun Wyller says: ‘Recent research on CFS pathophysiology has revealed alterations of cardiovascular regulation and thermoregulation, characterized by enhanced sympathetic nervous activity and increased secretion of epinephrine. These findings indicate a state of permanent distress response – sustained arousal – in CFS patients. Based upon our findings, we have formulated a theory of sustained arousal in CFS, which seems to correspond quite neatly to the theoretical considerations underlying the Lightning Process.’

The LP hypothesis concurs with the findings of a recent systematic review of CFS/ME by Maksoud et al., 2020 ((A systematic review of neurological impairments in myalgic encephalomyelitis/ chronic fatigue syndrome using neuroimaging techniques. PLOS ONE, 15(4), e0232475. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0232475)), which concludes that, ‘The results suggest widespread disruption of the autonomic nervous system network including morphological changes, white matter abnormalities and aberrations in functional connectivity.’

Pain can be changed

• Managing pain by neural retraining. ((A longitudinal study of the efficacy of a comprehensive pain rehabilitation program with opioid withdrawal: comparison of treatment outcomes based on opioid use status at admission. doi: 10.1016/j.pain.2008.08.005))
• Pain levels are affected by beliefs and expectations. ((U. Bingel, V. Wanigasekera, K. Wiech, R. Ni Mhuircheartaigh, M. C. Lee, M. Ploner, I. Tracey. The Effect of Treatment Expectation on Drug Efficacy: Imaging the Analgesic Benefit of the Opioid Remifentanil. Science Translational Medicine, 2011; 3 (70): 70ra14 DOI: 10.1126/scitranslmed.3001244))
• Pain reduction due to placebo isn’t ‘in the mind’ it is caused by the patient producing their own opioids internally.(( Medoff, Z. M., & Colloca, L. (2015). Placebo analgesia: understanding the mechanisms. Pain management, 5(2), 89–96. doi:10.2217/pmt.15.3)) ((Benedetti F. (2006) Placebo and Endogenous Mechanisms of Analgesia. In: Stein C. (eds) Analgesia. Handbook of Experimental Pharmacology, vol 177. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg https://link.springer.com/chapter/10.1007/978-3-540-33823-9_14))
• Pain and depression affect the same opioid systems ((Peciña, M., Karp, J.F., Mathew, S. et al. Endogenous opioid system dysregulation in depression: implications for new therapeutic approaches. Mol Psychiatry 24, 576–587 (2019) doi:10.1038/s41380-018-0117-2))
• Pain and anxiety are interlinked. ((Min Zhuo, Neural Mechanisms Underlying Anxiety–Chronic Pain Interactions, Trends in Neurosciences,Volume 39, Issue 3,2016,Pages 136-145,ISSN 0166-2236, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tins.2016.01.006.))